Stellantis shareholders sue automaker in US after disappointing earnings

admin admin | 08-16 16:30

Last week, Stellantis announced a potential 2,450 layoffs at a suburban Detroit truck assembly plant, where production of the Ram 1500 Classic truck is ending.
Stellantis has been sued by shareholders in the United States who said the European-American automaker defrauded them by concealing rising inventories and other weakness, before posting disappointing earnings that caused its stock price to fall.

The complaint filed on Thursday in Manhattan federal court said Stellantis artificially inflated its stock price for much of 2024 by making "overwhelmingly positive" assessments about inventories, pricing power, new products and operating margin.

Shareholders said the truth came out on July 25 when Stellantis said first-half adjusted operating income fell 40% to 8.46 billion euros (USD 9.28 billion), below the 8.85 billion euros that analysts expected.

Stellantis also said adjusted operating income margin had fallen below its double-digit full-year target.

Its U.S.-listed shares fell USD 1.94, or 9.9%, to USD 17.66 in the two trading days after the announcement.

Chief Executive Carlos Tavares and Chief Financial Officer Natalie Knight are also defendants. The automaker had no immediate comment.

Stellantis was created in 2021 from the merger of Fiat Chrysler and France's PSA. Its 14 brands include Alfa Romeo, Citroen, Dodge, Jeep, Maserati, Opel, Peugeot, Ram and others.

It is common for shareholders to sue companies in the United States after unexpected stock price declines.

Thursday's lawsuit seeks unspecified damages for Stellantis shareholders between Feb. 15 and July 24, 2024.

A lawyer for the shareholders did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Stellantis shares closed up 1.7% at USD 15.84 on Thursday in New York.

Last week, Stellantis announced a potential 2,450 layoffs at a suburban Detroit truck assembly plant, where production of the Ram 1500 Classic truck is ending.

The case is Long v Stellantis NV et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 24-06196.

Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.


ALSO READ

Ola Electric responds to ARAI notice, says prices of S1 X 2 kWh scooter unchanged

Ola Electric provided an invoice dated October 6, showing a INR 5,000 discount given to customers, a...

Hyundai Motor IPO’s off to a slow start

Around 35% of the total shares in the offering are reserved for retail investors, while QIBs and NII...

Under fire, Ola Electric taps EY India to get back on track

Close to a dozen executives from EY came on-board at Ola Electric a few weeks ago on deputation for ...

Tata Motors secures 5-star BNCAP safety ratings for Nexon, Curvv, and EV models in latest crash tests

Tata Curvv.EV BNCAP testTata Motors did it again! Tata Motors has once again secured 5 star rating i...

India needs to step up manufacturing to meet Viksit Bharat goal: Volvo Grp India MD

Volvo Group India Managing Director and President, Kamal Bali. The manufacturing sector is a weak li...

Dollar pullback to help Indian rupee, weak risk appetite to weigh

Investors are now nearly certain that the U.S. Federal Reserve will deliver a 25-basis-point rate cu...