On May 28, SpiceJet vehemently denied the claims made by KAL Airways and Kalanithi Maran, who are seeking damages amounting to Rs. 1,323 crore.
In a press statement, SpiceJet said, “…strongly refutes the claims made by KAL Airways and Kalanithi Maran regarding seeking damages of Rs.1323 crore. These assertions are not only legally untenable but also a regurgitation of previously rejected claims by the Arbitral Tribunal and then the Delhi High Court.”
The statement added that KAL Airways and Kalanithi Maran initially sought damages of more than Rs.1300 crore during the arbitration proceedings. This claim was thoroughly examined and subsequently rejected by a panel of three retired Supreme Court judges.
Following this, KAL Airways and Kalanithi Maran appealed to the Single-Judge Bench of the Delhi High Court, seeking the same amount in damages, which was again rejected by the court, the SpiceJet statement added.
“Notably, they chose not to pursue any appeal before the appellate jurisdiction and consequently, the matter attained finality. This matter is devoid of any merit and appears to be an endeavour to sensationalise the issue and mislead the public.”
“The Division Bench of the Delhi High Court on May 17, 2024, ruled in favour of SpiceJet and Ajay Singh. Following the success before the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court, SpiceJet will now pursue a refund of Rs.450 crores,” SpiceJet added.
Rs 1,323 Cr in Damages from SpiceJet, Ajay Singh
The statement came after KAL Airways and Kalanithi Maran on Monday said they will seek more than Rs 1,323 crore in damages from SpiceJet and its chief Ajay Singh as well as challenge the recent Delhi High Court order in the ongoing dispute between the two sides.
On May 17, a division bench of the court set aside a single judge bench order that had upheld an arbitral award asking SpiceJet and its promoter Ajay Singh to refund Rs 579 crore plus interest to Maran.
The bench allowed the appeals filed by Singh and SpiceJet challenging the single judge’s order, passed on July 31, 2023, and remanded the matter back to the court concerned to consider the petitions challenging the arbitral award afresh.
Against this backdrop, Maran and his firm KAL Airways have decided to challenge the ruling after consultation with their legal counsel.
The decree holders — KAL Airways and Maran — “believe that the aforesaid judgement is deeply flawed and warrants further scrutiny”.
“In parallel, they are also seeking damages over Rs 1,323 crore, as determined by FTI Consulting LLP, United Kingdom, a globally renowned firm that specialises in estimation of losses arising out of breach of contractual commitments,” KAL Airways said in a statement on Monday.
Further, it said the claim for damages had originally been presented by KAL Airways and Maran before the arbitral tribunal and “has always remained an integral part of their quest for justice”.
the challenge to the Delhi High Court judgement and the claim for damages, the decree holders hope to secure a just and equitable resolution to the contentious dispute, the statement said.
The dispute arose due to a breach of trust by SpiceJet and has caused “enormous hardship to both KAL Airways and Kalanithi Maran for more than a decade,” it added.
According to the statement, they will pursue the execution of the arbitral award, seeking a refund of the pending dues amounting to Rs 353.50 crore.
“This action is also in full compliance with, and supported by, the orders dated February 13, 2023, and July 7, 2023, passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court directing that the award in favour of the decree holders is executed in its entirety,” it said.
On May 22, SpiceJet said it will seek a refund of Rs 450 crore out of the total Rs 730 crore paid to the airline’s former promoter Maran and KAL Airways following the Delhi High Court ruling.
The case dates back to early 2015, when Singh, who owned the airline earlier, bought it back from Maran after it was grounded for months due to resource crunch.
As part of the agreement, Maran and KAL Airways had claimed to have paid SpiceJet Rs 679 crore for issuing warrants and preference shares.
However, Maran approached the Delhi High Court in 2017, alleging SpiceJet had not issued convertible warrants and preference shares nor returned the money.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
